Posted on 28 January 2009. Tags: Courtesy Pay, Credit Union Fees, US Senate Federal Credit Union
Effective March 1, members of the U.S. Senate Federal Credit Union will pay $28 per non-sufficient funds transaction. Senators (and their staffs) should know that the fee for a payday loan is typically $15-$17 per $100. Just something to keep in mind if they are at risk for overdrawing their checking account…

Posted in alternatives, industry, Ohio, Uncategorized
Posted on 28 January 2009. Tags: virginia payday lending legislature
This editorial in the News Advance (VA) demonstrates that these writers don’t get that a 36% rate cap is a ban:
Herring’s bill says that if payday lenders get into open-end loans, they can charge no more than 36 percent interest. Other legislators have offered bills that would prevent payday lenders from getting into open-end loans at all. That would still leave them charging as much as 360 percent annual interest for a line of credit up to $750.
Notice that there’s no math describing what 36% means ($1.38 on a $100 loan).
Posted in industry, media coverage, regulation, states, Virginia
Posted on 28 January 2009. Tags: Kentucky payday lending legislation
The “blue grass” state is tackling all kinds of problems. Payday lending legislation not high on the agenda according to this article.
Posted in industry, Kentucky, media coverage, regulation
Posted on 28 January 2009. Tags: South Carolina payday lending bill
That’s the take of the Spartanburg (S.C.) Herald-Journal on the South Carolina legislation:
The bills would raise the limit of a payday loan from $300 to $600, but it would limit consumers to carrying only one such loan at a time. It would establish a database to track payday loans and require lenders to check it to verify that a customer is eligible for a loan.
The legislation would put an appropriate curb on payday lending. Recent economic history has shown that such reasonable regulation, particularly of credit markets, can be necessary. But the bill is not an overreaction to the business.
We’re all for “reasonable.”
Posted in industry, media coverage, regulation, South Carolina, Spartanburg Herald Journal
Posted on 28 January 2009. Tags: North Dakota payday lending
No, not Notre Dame, North Dakota. A bill was introduced there to lower fees on payday loans:
The measure says the limits on payday loan fees should be reduced from 20 to 15 percent.
It seeks to cut maximum loans from $500 to $250, and put a $300 limit on the amount of money someone may borrow from a single payday lender. Now, the limit is $600.
We think when they say cut the limit from 20 to15%, they mean the fee on $100 would be cut from $20 to $15.
Posted in industry, media coverage, North Dakota, regulation, states
Posted on 27 January 2009. Tags: payday loan alternatives, short term credit market
New information from CFSA on the size of the unsecured, short-term credit market.
***
Consumer Demand for Unsecured, Short-Term Credit is Undeniable. Millions of Americans are struggling to make ends meet, with nearly half living paycheck to paycheck. Rising unemployment rates have caused more families to transition from two-income to one-income households and hourly jobs and overtime payments are being scaled back significantly.
Market Alternatives. Consumers facing a necessary expense and caught short between paydays must often choose between costly and undesirable options: pay the bill now and face bounced check or overdraft protection fees; pay the bill late and incur late penalties; borrow from friends and family; or take out a loan from an unknown Internet lender. Removing one option in today’s environment will only force consumers into more expensive, less desirable and unregulated alternatives.

Get more information.
Posted in alternatives, industry