<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; Wichita Eagle</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/wichita-eagle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Witchita Eagle gets it wrong</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/31/witchita-eagle-gets-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/31/witchita-eagle-gets-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita Eagle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Consumer Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Consumer Freedom responds to a recent editorial in Kansas’ Witchita Eagle.
“…The Eagle editorial ignored these critical facts while narrowly focusing an ad hominem critique on the payday industry alone. These lenders earn a mere fraction of what traditional banks make on service fees. In 2003, bounced-check and insufficient-fund fees generated $22 billion in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">The Center for Consumer Freedom </span><a href="http://www.kansas.com/711/story/355643.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">responds </span></a><span style="font-size: small;">to a recent editorial in Kansas’ Witchita Eagle.</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">“…The Eagle editorial ignored these critical facts while narrowly focusing an ad hominem critique on the payday industry alone. These lenders earn a mere fraction of what traditional banks make on service fees. In 2003, bounced-check and insufficient-fund fees generated $22 billion in bank revenues, which was equal to 18 percent of banks’ net operating income. The banking industry brought in an additional $57 billion in late fees.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">“Vulnerable Kansans” are best served when they have the ability to bridge temporary stress in their budget. Instead of restricting payday lenders, government should focus on making sure consumers have the ability to choose the best borrowing option for their needs.</span></span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/31/witchita-eagle-gets-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
