<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; Show-Me Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/show-me-institute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Show me some numbers</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/09/show-me-some-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/09/show-me-some-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Hauke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show-Me Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin Hauke of the Show-Me Institute provided some interesting numbers yesterday on payday loans in Missouri. Hauke’s numbers highlight that despite triple-digit annual interest rates which people commonly cite, customers only pay a fraction of that in fees. What’s more:
Before readers are outraged at the interest rates being charged on such loans, it’s worth considering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Justin Hauke of the </span><a href="http://www.showmeinstitute.org/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">Show-Me Institute</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> provided </span><a href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2008/04/fun-with-number.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">some interesting numbers</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> yesterday on payday loans in Missouri. Hauke’s numbers highlight that despite triple-digit annual interest rates which people commonly cite, customers only pay a fraction of that in fees. What’s more:</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Before readers are outraged at the interest rates being charged on such loans, it’s worth considering the annual interest charged on other consumer products. The perfect example is late fees on video rentals. For example, despite the fact that Blockbuster </span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36767-2005Feb18.html"><span style="font-size: small;">advertises</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> a “no late fee” policy, the company in fact charges a $1.50 restocking fee for rentals more than eight days past due. If you consider an average rental cost of $5, this restocking fee would translate into a simple interest rate of 1,369 percent if expressed as an annual rate (assuming no compounding). But nobody accuses Blockbuster of being usurious.</span></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Just some food for thought.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/09/show-me-some-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
