<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; Payday lending arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/payday-lending-arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Uh, excuse me&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/29/uh-excuse-me/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/29/uh-excuse-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payday lending arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=1799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story out of Arizona encouraging a NO vote on Prop 200 misses the point: 
Prop. 200: No
Incorrectly called the &#8220;Payday Loan Reform Act,&#8221; this initiative pushed by the industry would make the law it operates under permanent instead of expiring in 2010. The industry provides a service, but it is overused. The Legislature should be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20180312&amp;BRD=1817&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=222087&amp;rfi=6" target="_blank">This story </a>out of Arizona encouraging a NO vote on Prop 200 misses the point: </p>
<blockquote><p>Prop. 200: No</p>
<p>Incorrectly called the &#8220;Payday Loan Reform Act,&#8221; this initiative pushed by the industry would make the law it operates under permanent instead of expiring in 2010. The industry provides a service, but it is overused. The Legislature should be responsible for regulating payday loans.</p></blockquote>
<p>The reason there is a Proposition is that the legislature punted on this.  It had all year to act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/29/uh-excuse-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
