<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; National Center for Policy Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/national-center-for-policy-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>National Center for Policy Analysis on bounced checks and payday loans</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/11/national-center-for-policy-analysis-on-bounced-checks-and-payday-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/11/national-center-for-policy-analysis-on-bounced-checks-and-payday-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bounced check fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Center for Policy Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Center for Policy Analysis has a short article on the high costs of bounced check fees and the negative impact of payday loan bans.
Read “Bad Bounce” 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="sitename" style="margin: auto 0in;"><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">The </span><a href="http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=15686" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">National Center for Policy Analysis</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> has a short article on the high costs of bounced check fees and the negative impact of payday loan bans.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Read </span><a title="Bad Bounce" href="http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=15686" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;"><em><span style="font-family: ">“Bad Bounce”</span></em> </span></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/11/national-center-for-policy-analysis-on-bounced-checks-and-payday-loans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan study continues to get noticed</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/10/morgan-study-continues-to-get-noticed/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/10/morgan-study-continues-to-get-noticed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Center for Responsible Lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Center for Policy Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National  Center for Policy Analysis, a think tank out of Dallas, is talking about the Dan Morgan payday lending study on its web site.   The study, which will be published soon, will have a major impact on this debate.   It will be an interesting contrast: a peer reviewed, published study by a respected economist (Morgan) versus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">The National  Center for Policy Analysis, a think tank out of Dallas, is talking about the Dan Morgan payday lending study on its </span><a href="http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=15686"><span style="font-size: small;">web site</span></a><span style="font-size: small;">.   The study, which will be published soon, will have a major impact on this debate.   It will be an interesting contrast: a peer reviewed, published study by a respected economist (Morgan) versus the unreviewed, unpublished and sloppy research of the Center for Responsible Lending and other critics. </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/10/morgan-study-continues-to-get-noticed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
