<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; Consumers Union</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/consumers-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No passing grades for states with financial choices</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/08/29/no-passing-grades-for-states-with-financial-choices/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/08/29/no-passing-grades-for-states-with-financial-choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Federation of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Consumer Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Louis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union and the National Consumer Law Center have given two more states failing grades for offering choices to consumers.  Illinois and Missouri received straight F&#8217;s for having a multitude of short term credit options available to consumers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="St Louis Today" href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnists.nsf/savvyconsumer/story/F5567ED995E2F6A2862574B300828441?OpenDocument" target="_self">Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union and the National Consumer Law Center </a>have given two more states failing grades for offering choices to consumers.  Illinois and Missouri received straight F&#8217;s for having a multitude of short term credit options available to consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/08/29/no-passing-grades-for-states-with-financial-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does overdraft protection really protect you?</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/05/09/does-overdraft-protection-really-protect-you/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/05/09/does-overdraft-protection-really-protect-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Center for Responsible Lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bounced check fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Halperin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gail Hillebrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Trejos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Thrift Supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington Post columnist Nancy Trejos is skeptical.   From her column today which discusses the recent Federal Reserve proposal to crack down on &#8220;deceptive&#8221; practices:
&#8220;The OTS {Office of Thrift Supervision} and Fed proposal show that these agencies recognize that abusive overdraft loans are a significant problem,&#8221; said Eric Halperin, DC director of the Center for Responsible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post columnist <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thecheckout/2008/05/does_overdraft_protection_real.html?nav=rss_blog" target="_blank">Nancy Trejos is skeptical</a>.   From her column today which discusses the recent Federal Reserve proposal to crack down on &#8220;deceptive&#8221; practices:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The OTS {Office of Thrift Supervision} and Fed proposal show that these agencies recognize that abusive overdraft loans are a significant problem,&#8221; said Eric Halperin, DC director of the Center for Responsible Lending. &#8220;However, they would continue to allow banks to enroll customers, who never signed up for it, into the most expensive credit program the bank offers.&#8221;</p>
<p>They also urged the agencies to consider banning overdraft fees caused by check holds resulting from a bank&#8217;s policy to delay the availability of deposited funds. &#8220;These rules should also recognize that it is an unfair practice for a bank to charge an overdraft fee or a bounced check fee for a problem caused by the bank&#8217;s decision to place a hold on the consumer&#8217;s check deposit,&#8221; said Gail Hillebrand, financial services campaign manager of Consumers Union.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Payday Pundit has been making the point over and over again the payday lending customers are frequently trying to avoid bounced check fees and overdraft protection costs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/05/09/does-overdraft-protection-really-protect-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
