<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; Arkansas Business Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/arkansas-business-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Analysis of Ark. payday lending situation</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/14/analysis-of-ark-payday-lending-situation/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/14/analysis-of-ark-payday-lending-situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Business Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arkansas Business Journal picks up on an Associated Press story that analyzes how we got to this point in Arkansas.  This paragraph gets to the heart of the matter:
“The 1999 law {the Check Cashers Act} declared that income earned by payday lenders was a fee and not interest, avoiding the 17 percent limit on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">The </span><a href="http://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article.aspx?aID=104455.67019.116597" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">Arkansas Business Journal </span></a><span style="font-size: small;">picks up on an Associated Press story that analyzes how we got to this point in Arkansas.  This paragraph gets to the heart of the matter:</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><em><span style="font-family: ">“The 1999 law {the Check Cashers Act} declared that income earned by payday lenders was a fee and not interest, avoiding the 17 percent limit on interest set out in the Arkansas Constitution. The Supreme Court in 2001 ruled that the Legislature had no power to determine what is or isn’t interest, but the court didn’t rule on the constitutionality of the act.”    </span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">The article goes on to say that the Arkansas State Board of Collection Agencies will continue to issue licenses to payday lenders. </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/14/analysis-of-ark-payday-lending-situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
