<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; Tucson Citizen</title>
	<atom:link href="/category/media-coverage/tucson-citizen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Better math education</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/01/14/better-math-education/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/01/14/better-math-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tucson Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Tucsan Citizen no less, a paper that hasn&#8217;t been kind to the payday lending industry: Simple fees get translated into confusing annual percentage rates. A short-term payday loan doesn&#8217;t sound like a good solution when described as 391 percent annual percentage rate. But analyzed the same way, it&#8217;s a better idea than bouncing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/columns/107559.php" target="_blank">Tucsan Citizen </a>no less, a paper that hasn&#8217;t been kind to the payday lending industry:</p>
<blockquote><p>Simple fees get translated into confusing annual percentage rates. A short-term payday loan doesn&#8217;t sound like a good solution when described as 391 percent annual percentage rate. But analyzed the same way, it&#8217;s a better idea than bouncing a check where common bank overdraft fees can be as much as 4,954 percent APR. (Actually, in both cases, the percentage fees are not accurate ways to describe the cost.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/01/14/better-math-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We don&#8217;t care for this opinion</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/31/we-dont-care-for-this-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/31/we-dont-care-for-this-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=1809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because it was written by a child throwing a tamper tantrum.  From today&#8217;s Tucson Citizen: In exploiting its own negative image, the {payday lending} industry is running TV ads lambasting predatory lenders and urging you to &#8220;END RIP-OFFS,&#8221; &#8220;end unfair practices&#8221; and &#8220;bring payday lenders under control.&#8221; Oh, please.  They&#8217;ve never seen smart, clever tactics to win [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it was written by a child throwing a tamper tantrum.  From <a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/fromcomments/101210.php" target="_blank">today&#8217;s Tucson Citizen</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In exploiting its own negative image, the {payday lending} industry is running TV ads lambasting predatory lenders and urging you to &#8220;END RIP-OFFS,&#8221; &#8220;end unfair practices&#8221; and &#8220;bring payday lenders under control.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, please.  They&#8217;ve never seen smart, clever tactics to win a ballot initiative?  These people need to grow up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/31/we-dont-care-for-this-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An expected development in AZ</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/14/an-expected-development-in-az/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/14/an-expected-development-in-az/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=1667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A credit union group opposes the payday lending initiative.   The Payday Pundit is sure they&#8217;re doing it out of the goodness of their heart, not because they benefit financially.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/opinion/99417.php" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">A credit union group</span> </a>opposes the payday lending initiative.   The Payday Pundit is sure they&#8217;re doing it out of the goodness of their heart, not because they benefit financially.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/10/14/an-expected-development-in-az/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
