<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Payday Pundit &#187; LA Times</title>
	<atom:link href="/category/media-coverage/la-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paydaypundit.org</link>
	<description>News and Information About The Payday Lending Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The cheapest reporting</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/21/the-cheapest-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/21/the-cheapest-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the media is writing about campaign contributions to politicians, it is illuminating nothing.  Politicians take contributions.  They take them from industries who are regulated.  That&#8217;s they way democracy works.   From today&#8217;s LA Times: Reporting from Hartford, Conn. &#8212; Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), who has won praise from consumer groups for taking on credit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the media is writing about campaign contributions to politicians, it is illuminating nothing.  Politicians take contributions.  They take them from industries who are regulated.  That&#8217;s they way democracy works.   From today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-dodd21-2009apr21,0,5553103.story" target="_blank">LA Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reporting from Hartford, Conn. &#8212; Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), who has won praise from consumer groups for taking on credit card providers over predatory lending practices, has collected thousands of dollars in donations from people affiliated with the so-called payday loan industry.</p>
<p>The lawmaker raised more than $44,000 from pawnshop owners and other businesses that provide high-interest loans, often to people with bad credit ratings, according to campaign finance reports.</p></blockquote>
<p>And $44,000 is a pittance compared to the total Dodd will raise for his re-election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/21/the-cheapest-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian loophole criticized</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/15/indian-loophole-criticized/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/15/indian-loophole-criticized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Los Angeles Times editorializes about online lenders who partner with Indian tribes.  We don&#8217;t like the name calling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-payday15-2009apr15,0,2329546.story" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a> editorializes about online lenders who partner with Indian tribes.  We don&#8217;t like the name calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/15/indian-loophole-criticized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Troubles with internet lending in California</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/13/troubles-with-internet-lending-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/13/troubles-with-internet-lending-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet payday lenders with ties to Indians dodge Cali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Lifsher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LA Times reports that regulators in California are having a difficult time regulating some online lenders, many which are located offshore.  The article really speaks to the need for consumers to have access to regulated, storefront lenders.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-internet-loans13-2009apr13,0,5737402.story" target="_blank"> <em>LA Times</em> reports </a>that regulators in California are having a difficult time regulating some online lenders, many which are located offshore.  The article really speaks to the need for consumers to have access to regulated, storefront lenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/04/13/troubles-with-internet-lending-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overdraft protection &#8220;expensive&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/03/23/overdraft-protection-expensive/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/03/23/overdraft-protection-expensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media is finally catching on.  We missed this from last friday&#8217;s Los Angeles Times: &#8220;They [banks] say they&#8217;re covering your transaction as a courtesy,&#8221; said Wright, a self-employed businessman from Dayton, Ohio. &#8220;But they&#8217;re making a killing. I don&#8217;t want them to approve a debit when I don&#8217;t have enough to cover it in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media is finally catching on.  We missed this from last friday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-perfin22-2009mar22,0,4322963.column" target="_blank">Los Angeles Time</a>s:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;They [banks] say they&#8217;re covering your transaction as a courtesy,&#8221; said Wright, a self-employed businessman from Dayton, Ohio. &#8220;But they&#8217;re making a killing. I don&#8217;t want them to approve a debit when I don&#8217;t have enough to cover it in my account. This is a complete fraud.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve, which sets some banking rules, has been weighing new regulations for overdrafts for more than a year. They&#8217;re giving consumers the ability to comment until the end of March, with the anticipation that they&#8217;ll come out with final rules by this summer.</p>
<p>The rules are necessary, experts contend, because most banks now automatically enroll checking account customers in overdraft plans &#8212; and some banks won&#8217;t let them out. Bank of America, for example, doesn&#8217;t give consumers the option of dropping overdraft protection, a company spokeswoman says. If you have a checking account with the bank, you have it. Period.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/03/23/overdraft-protection-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have we mentioned this before?</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/02/25/have-we-mentioned-this-before/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/02/25/have-we-mentioned-this-before/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Payday lending customers are banked!   This Los Angeles Times story would take all to rebut, but so decided to just point out the obvious.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Payday lending customers are banked!   <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-pastor25-2009feb25,0,724498.story" target="_blank">This Los Angeles Times</a> story would take all to rebut, but so decided to just point out the obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2009/02/25/have-we-mentioned-this-before/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230;&#8221;homemakers, firefighters and teachers&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/12/24/that-took-a-lot-of-work/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/12/24/that-took-a-lot-of-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Responsible Lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Federation of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those are the payday lending customers discussed in this this four-page story in the Los Angeles Times headlined:  &#8220;More in middle class using payday lenders&#8221;:  With tidy lobbies that resemble bank branches, many outlets are in shopping centers anchored by Wal-Marts, grocery stores or other big retailers. Lenders say their typical customers include homemakers, firefighters and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are the payday lending customers discussed in this <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fi-payday24-2008dec24,0,4193286.story" target="_blank">this four-page story </a>in the Los Angeles Times headlined:  &#8220;More in middle class using payday lenders&#8221;: </p>
<blockquote><p>With tidy lobbies that resemble bank branches, many outlets are in shopping centers anchored by Wal-Marts, grocery stores or other big retailers. Lenders say their typical customers include homemakers, firefighters and teachers, whose steady jobs qualify them for loans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, the typical customer is the typical American. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the side bar to the article:  &#8220;<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-paydaybox24-2008dec24,0,1017525.story" target="_blank">How payday loans work</a>.&#8221; </p>
<blockquote><p> </p></blockquote>
<p>Short of cash to fix her ailing BMW this year, Lunetta Blanks could have paid the bill with plastic. Instead, the federal investigator opted for a payday loan, shelling out $300 to pay off a $255 loan from the Advance America branch in her Silver Lake neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/12/24/that-took-a-lot-of-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overwhelming response</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/12/19/overwhelming-response/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/12/19/overwhelming-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed credit card rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=2147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fed announcement of new credit card rules was covered in more than 1,000 newspapers.  The Los Angeles Times piece is typical:    Responding to rising consumer complaints, federal regulators Thursday adopted the most sweeping new rules for the credit card industry in three decades, including tougher restrictions on interest rate hikes and late fees. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed announcement of new credit card rules was covered in more than 1,000 newspapers.  The <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fi-credit19-2008dec19,0,921082.story" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a> piece is typical:   </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="storybody">Responding to rising consumer complaints, federal regulators Thursday adopted the most sweeping new rules for the credit card industry in three decades, including tougher restrictions on interest rate hikes and late fees.</div>
<p>The regulations, which take effect in July 2010, would block card companies from applying higher interest rates on existing balances. Late fees could not be charged without giving consumers at least 21 days to make a payment.</p></blockquote>
<div class="storybody">America&#8217;s love-hate relationship with credit cards will go on forever.  </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/12/19/overwhelming-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk Management Lowers Available Credit</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/11/19/risk-management-lowers-available-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/11/19/risk-management-lowers-available-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=1970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story is becoming all too common.  Credit card companies are looking at the numbers from Wall Street, the rising number of people without work and getting worried that people will begin to rely too heavily on the credit they&#8217;ve extended and be unable to pay it back.  This applies even to good customers, ones [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a title="Credit Card Holders Squeezed" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-creditcard18-2008nov18,0,1390093.story" target="_blank">story </a>is becoming all too common.  Credit card companies are looking at the numbers from Wall Street, the rising number of people without work and getting worried that people will begin to rely too heavily on the credit they&#8217;ve extended and be unable to pay it back.  This applies even to good customers, ones that have been paying more than the minimum every month.  The government isn&#8217;t the only entity that can limit credit options and with the policy actions we&#8217;ve seen against payday lending across the country, combined with more stringent requirements for long term loans and credit card companies reeling it in, consumers are going to find it more difficult to get credit when they need it most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/11/19/risk-management-lowers-available-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center for Responsible Lending relies on “shoddy research”</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/07/center-for-responsible-lending-relies-on-%e2%80%9cshoddy-research%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/07/center-for-responsible-lending-relies-on-%e2%80%9cshoddy-research%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Responsible Lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Rights League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Kibbe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry Kibbe of the Consumers Rights League weighs in.    From her piece in today’s Los Angeles Times: “The Center for Responsible Lending and other so-called consumer advocacy groups rely on shoddy research in stirring gender, racial and class sensitivities to make the case against payday loans, as they did during their successful crusades in Georgia and North [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Terry Kibbe of the Consumers Rights League </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-oew-kibbe7apr07,0,6506874.story" target="_self"><span style="font-size: small;">weighs in.</span></a><span style="font-size: small;">    From her piece in today’s Los Angeles Times:</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: small;"><em><span style="font-family: ">“The Center for Responsible Lending and other so-called consumer advocacy groups rely on shoddy research in stirring gender, racial and class sensitivities to make the case against payday loans, as they did during their successful crusades in Georgia and North Carolina to run payday shops out of business. Though they claimed that the elimination of payday loans saved Georgia residents approximately $154 million per year, that claim was refuted by a Federal Reserve </span></em><span style="font-family: "><a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr309.pdf"><em><span style="font-family: ">report</span></em></a><em><span style="font-family: "> (pdf) indicating that consumers ended up paying more through overdraft bank charges and late fees. Critics of payday loans are content to ignore that the mass of payday borrowers are middle-income, educated consumers.”</span></em></span></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Terri goes on to oppose “big brother” restrictions on payday lending. </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/04/07/center-for-responsible-lending-relies-on-%e2%80%9cshoddy-research%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughtful piece in LA Times</title>
		<link>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/25/thoughtful-piece-in-la-times/</link>
		<comments>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/25/thoughtful-piece-in-la-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Payday Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Thornberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paydaypundit.org/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economist Christopher Thornberg has provocative column on payday lending in the Los Angeles Times.  Great quote from the piece: Despite high fees, people continue to use payday lenders with some frequency. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me eight or nine times, and clearly something else is up. It might be easy to accuse the firms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">Economist Christopher Thornberg has provocative column on payday lending in the </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-leonard-thornberg25mar25,1,2790750.story" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">Los Angeles Times</span></a><span style="font-size: small;">.  Great quote from the piece:</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: small;"><em><span style="font-family: ">Despite high fees, people continue to use payday lenders with some frequency. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me eight or nine times, and clearly something else is up. It might be easy to accuse the firms of taking advantage of people and earning unfairly high profits, but if profits are so high, why hasn’t there been a mad rush by the very competitive banking industry to provide these services in underserved neighborhoods? Given my personal financial institution’s predilection for hidden fees and what would seem to be unfair charges for even simple services, I wouldn’t chalk it up to an ethics issue.  </span></em></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: "><span style="font-size: small;">He goes on to advocate competition as the best answer to payday lending.  That’s something the industry has said for years.  Competition drives prices down and serves consumers best. </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paydaypundit.org/2008/03/25/thoughtful-piece-in-la-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
